Jonathan Reynolds MP

Campaigning for the communities of Stalybridge, Hyde, Mossley, Longdendale, and Dukinfield

 

Hyde Town Team has received 'Special Recognition' in the Great British High Street Awards 2015. This is a team that has worked tirelessly throughout 2015, and I am so proud to see all their efforts recognised. I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate everyone who has been involved.

Marcus Roberts, the Minister for Local Government wrote and Simon Roberts, Executive Vice President of Walgreens Boots Alliance and President of Boots, wrote to the Town Team as Co-Chairs of the Future High Street Forum. They praised "the tireless work of the town team, in resisting negativity, changing attitudes and working with the community to improve the town environment".

I look forward to another year of fantastic events throughout 2016 as the Hyde Town Team continues to play a huge role in the future of our town. To see all the latest news from the team and information on how to get involve in future events, please follow the link here.

Special Recognition for Hyde Town Team

  Hyde Town Team has received 'Special Recognition' in the Great British High Street Awards 2015. This is a team that has worked tirelessly throughout 2015, and I am so...

Today I have written to Tameside Hospital to discuss the waiting time statistics for their Accident and Emergency Department. Tameside Hospital is on a continued journey of improvement, which is not helped by the lack of substantial funding due to decisions by central Government. To see a full version of the letter I sent please visit my Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonathanreynoldsMP/  

My letter to Tameside Hospital

Today I have written to Tameside Hospital to discuss the waiting time statistics for their Accident and Emergency Department. Tameside Hospital is on a continued journey of improvement, which is...

You will be aware that there has been a reshuffle of the Labour frontbench underway since the beginning of the week. Following the announcements made at midnight on Tuesday, I decided that it would be best for me to resign from the frontbench and work for the Party from the backbenches.

This is principally because I want the freedom to be able to do and say things beyond the remit of my brief as shadow transport minister. I have been anxious recently as to whether devoting the necessary time to being the shadow rail minister gave me sufficient scope to do all the other things I want to do, particularly in light of the forthcoming EU referendum and the continuing Tory cuts that are affecting our local area. In my resignation statement I therefore wanted to make clear my respect and personal regard for Jeremy, who I have got on well with in the role given our shared love of public transport. I am explicitly not calling into question Jeremy's role or mandate as leader, but rather deciding that it is not the best use of my time or talents to be on the frontbench at this time. One of the things I like about Jeremy, even when I disagree with him, is his authenticity and honesty. We surely need more of it in politics.

Over the last few months there have been a number of issues where I haven't been entirely happy with our frontbench position, including on the Devolution Bill which has a direct relevance to Greater Manchester. I also did a speech and presented a bill on reforming our voting system, which strictly speaking isn't permitted of a frontbencher. So when I saw the announcements late on Tuesday night, particularly regarding the sacking of Pat McFadden for reasons which I could not agree with, I felt the principled thing to do was to leave. I am obviously aware there have since been other resignations, with people giving their own reasons. This is entirely a matter for those individuals - the only person who I made aware of my intentions was Claire.

I hope people will recognise through the wording of my letter, which you can find on my Facebook page (www.facebook.com/JonathanReynoldsMP), that I have tried to act with dignity and integrity at this time, and also agree that it was best to leave as part of a proper reshuffle rather than resign at another time.

My resignation from the frontbench

You will be aware that there has been a reshuffle of the Labour frontbench underway since the beginning of the week. Following the announcements made at midnight on Tuesday, I...

JR_family_pic.jpgLike most people with young families Christmas is undoubtedly one of my favourite times of the year, but it also one of the busiest, a sentiment I am sure many parents will recognise. Over the past few weeks my staff and I have tried to get through all the correspondence I receive from constituents before we finish for the holidays, as well as continuing to raise a number of important issues in The House of Commons before it rose for Christmas recess yesterday. So as we look forward to taking a break and spending some quality time with our loved ones, I wanted to reflect on the past year, one that has been particularly eventful.

In March, I was delighted to become a father again, with the birth of my fourth child Seth, further expanding the size of the Reynolds’ clan. At the same time as Seth being born I was also busy standing for re-election and, although the General Election in May obviously produced a very disappointing result for the Labour Party, I was humbled to be re-elected for a second term with a substantially increased majority as the Member of Parliament for Stalybridge and Hyde, which also includes Mossley, Londgendale and Dukinfield. Being a Dad and an MP can be challenging at times, something I wrote about last month (http://huff.to/1NtbO6p). But it is at this point I want to pay tribute to my beautiful wife Claire, who is an amazing mother and a wonderful and loving wife. I couldn’t do it without you - thank you Claire.

After Labour’s election defeat, the party had a leadership election and duly elected Jeremy Corbyn as our party leader with a huge mandate from party members. Although I did not vote for Jeremy, I felt it was right to accept his invitation to join the party’s front bench team in Parliament as Shadow Rail Minister, an area I have already campaigned consistently on in the constituency over the last couple of years. You can read more about why I accepted to serve under Jeremy in my Huffington Post article here: http://huff.to/1QwTr3X.

Having good transport links is so important to me and the people of my constituency, which is why I will continue to press the Government to make sure the Mottram by-pass will be delivered as well as improved rail services across the whole of our area.

There has also been the need to make some very difficult decisions over the past year, none more difficult than the vote on military action in Syria. Many hundreds of constituents contacted me about this important issue and after considering all of the options, I decided to vote against military action. You can read the reasoning behind this decision here: http://bit.ly/1PaszUf

There have also been some delightful events that I have attended in the constituency during 2015. A highlight at Christmas is attending the Micklehurst Estate Residents Association (MERA) Christmas dinner and calling the bingo numbers. If I ever leave Parliament, I think I may have found my new calling! Also this year I had the pleasure of visiting Stalybridge Archery Club to celebrate their success in securing funds to extend their facilities. I did have a go at shooting some arrows and after a few rounds I managed to hit the gold, but I don’t think being an archer in the Olympics will be on the cards anytime soon.

Other highlights include welcoming representatives from Silver Springs Academy to the Palace of Westminster where they were receiving a special commendation award, participating in the charity ‘Welllython’ at Gorse Hall Primary school, the West Hill Awards evening and welcoming community champions Irene Raddings and Marie Milne, both of Mossley, to London and the Houses of Parliament after I nominated them to attend the Queen’s garden party at Buckingham Palace. The work they do and the work that many of you do from across the constituency is wonderful in helping to keep our community bonds in place.

Whilst for most people this is a happy time of year, we should also think of those less fortunate than ourselves. If you’re struggling financially, suffering from loneliness, or have recently lost a loved one, then this can be a difficult time of year. Extending a helping hand to a friend or neighbour in a moment of need can sometimes be the best gift we can give and I have no doubt that many people will be doing exactly that over the next couple of weeks.

As we approach 2016 I look forward to continuing to representing you and on that note, I’d just like to wish everybody a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year on behalf of me, my family and my team.

 

Jonathan

@jreynoldsMP / www.facebook.com/jonathanreynoldsMP

My Christmas and New Year message for 2015

Like most people with young families Christmas is undoubtedly one of my favourite times of the year, but it also one of the busiest, a sentiment I am sure many...


IMG_1882.JPGEarlier this month saw two new rail franchises awarded to rail companies that serve the North of England. This announcement followed the recently published Transport for the North (TfN) Autumn Report on the Northern Transport Strategy. 

The TfN report is a welcome vision for rail users North of the Watford Gap. As a Greater Manchester MP whose constituency is located at the foot of the Pennines, travelling across the region should not be as challenging and as time consuming as it is. The October announcement of the ‘unpausing’ of electrification of the North TransPennine line under pressure from Labour  showed that the Government is at last starting to grasp the importance of improved rail connectivity between the northern conurbations. But at what cost?

Network Rail will have to sell billions of pounds worth of assets to deliver on its promise as well as borrowing an extra £700 million from taxpayers. This follows the West Coast Main Line franchise debacle in 2012 which cost taxpayers over £50 million. It therefore begs the question, how long does the Government expect taxpayers to fund their continued failure to deliver railway infrastructure projects?

If we are to have a truly globally competitive economy across the North, we need to clarify certain aspects of the transport infrastructure of the Northern Powerhouse vision. For example, the vision of having a smart ticketing system should be outlined in more detail. I believe that rail users should be able to move across the North with similar ease as rail users do in London and the South East. This leads me to ask what the long-term vision is for TfN to ensure that it delivers for everyone across the North of England?

And then we have high speed rail. The government announced recently that the completion date for HS2 between Crewe and Birmingham has been brought forward by six years but can we be confident that this will be delivered, on time and on budget? The track record of this Government is that they big on announcements but fall short on delivery.

HS2 is vital for unblocking the capacity and connectivity constraints that continue to hold transport services in the North back, but it is also crucial that costs are kept under control. With the work of Lord Adonis’s Infrastructure Commission on-going, and the potential benefits that could be brought by HS3, there cannot be an ‘either-or-strategy’ when it comes to rail transport for the North.

Fundamentally, we need reliable and modern services that are affordable. I want people who live in my constituency to be able to work in Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield, Liverpool or Hull.  To deliver one north with one economy, the agenda must be stringent, constantly assessed and provide value for money. As Shadow Rail Minister, I will continue to push for clear objectives and innovative solutions that will ensure that the Northern Transport Strategy becomes a reality.

@jreynoldsMP / www.facebook.com/jonathanreynoldsMP

A Northern Transport Strategy for Rail: on time and on budget?

Earlier this month saw two new rail franchises awarded to rail companies that serve the North of England. This announcement followed the recently published Transport for the North (TfN) Autumn...

syria-war-flag1.jpgFurther to my statement last week (click here to view the statement), I listened very intently to the Prime Minister last Thursday when he came to the House of Commons to present his case for extending British airstrikes to ISIS targets in Syria. Despite my scepticism, I was willing to be convinced. In many ways I was hoping to be convinced. However, I cannot say that I was convinced. I therefore intend to vote against British airstrikes in Syria when the vote takes places tomorrow.

My fundamental concern remains that, whilst I want ISIS to be destroyed, I do not believe that airstrikes alone will be a sufficient strategy to do this. Ground forces will be required. The PM clearly acknowledged this in his statement, but his claim that the Free Syrian Army has sufficient forces to do this is not one I can agree with. Even if these forces are as numerous (i.e. 70,000 strong) as claimed, many are already engaged in fighting the pro-Assad regime Syrian Army. It seems the Government are still unwilling to acknowledge the unpalatable truth, which is that it is not possible to intervene on one side of a civil war without giving de facto assistance to the other side. ISIS clearly represent a threat to us in the UK, but the Assad regime has killed by far the most civilians and significantly fuelled the refugee crisis affecting Europe. There are no easy or simple options here.

Essentially, we are being asked to commit British forces to a theatre of war in which they would be pro-Free Syrian Army (FSA), anti-ISIS, and anti-Assad. In the same theatre are the Russians, who are anti-FSA, anti-ISIS, but pro-Assad. ISIS themselves are anti-FSA, anti-Russia, and anti-us. Meanwhile in Iraq, our allies against ISIS are the Turks and the Kurds, but they oppose each other. Turkey is also in a major stand off with Russia, having shot down one of their planes. In addition, our ally in the Middle East Saudi Arabia has a history of support for ISIS, whilst our major opponent, Iran, is on the same side as us in opposing them. I could go on, but it is reasonable to simply say this is a very complex situation that requires more than just military engagement. A wider diplomatic and political agreement, supported by regional ground forces and possibly then, Western air power, is the only way forward. This lack of a compelling overall strategy is why I will vote against the Government tomorrow, and it is a point echoed by many other members of the House of Commons, such as the Conservative Chair of the Defence Select Committee Julian Lewis MP.

Finally, much of the debate on this issue has been interpreted through the prism of the internal politics of the Labour Party. I regret this a great deal. I can promise all constituents that, on matters such as these, I make up my own mind regardless of the intentions of colleagues or the party leadership. The first thing I ever did as our MP, just days after the 2010 election, was attend the funeral of a young man from Hyde who lost his life in action in Afghanistan. Amongst a great many emotions felt that day, I promised myself I would only ever vote for British military action abroad if I was absolutely convinced of the case that had been made for it. There is a case for action in Syria, but I am not convinced it is sufficient to warrant voting yes tomorrow. My vote will therefore be to oppose the Government.

 

Photo credit: Freedom House (Creative Commons license)

Update: My latest Syria Statement

Further to my statement last week (click here to view the statement), I listened very intently to the Prime Minister last Thursday when he came to the House of Commons...

Voting.jpgOn Wednesday 2nd December, I will present the ‘Representation of the People (Proportional Representation) Bill’ to Parliament as a 10 Minute Rule Motion. The Bill will seek to change the way MP’s are elected, from the current ‘First Past the Post’ system, to the Additional Member System used in places such as Wales, Scotland and Germany.

First Past the Post as a system for electing MP’s is simply unfair and no longer fit for purpose. It has led to a narrow and unrepresentative politics, which in turn has turned people off from voting and politics as a whole. The last general election saw massive discrepancies in the number of seats a party got compared to their share of the vote. Not only is this hugely undemocratic, but the fact that we have reached 2015 yet still many people are unlikely to ever be represented by an MP from the party they vote for is shameful.

The Additional Member System is already used in Scotland and Wales and we use a form of PR for European Parliament elections, so PR is not an alien concept to British voters.  My Bill, which has cross-party support from Lib Dems, Greens and others, seeks to address the current imbalance and bring a greater semblance of fairness to our democracy.

 

Proportional Representation - Private Members Bill

On Wednesday 2nd December, I will present the ‘Representation of the People (Proportional Representation) Bill’ to Parliament as a 10 Minute Rule Motion. The Bill will seek to change the...

Jonathan_Reynolds_MP.jpgThe headline from yesterday’s Autumn Statement, Chairman Mao aside, is George Osborne’s apparent U-turn on cuts to tax credits, but that was just about the only piece of good news there was. What the Chancellor was hoping this would distract from is the devastating and swinging cuts that are about to be inflicted upon already decimated local authorities.

Tameside Council has already seen its budget effectively halved since 2010, having to make cuts of £104 million already, with another £90 million to come, and the cuts will keep on coming. It’s not just Tameside where these cuts are being felt, as you may have seen from my question to the Prime Minister last week, but shamefully more often than not it is less well-off areas who are seeing the biggest cuts.

New measures such as social care funding being moved from national to local taxation is especially worrying for an area such as Tameside, which has very large local health needs. The Chancellor has attempted to justify this by allowing councils to raise extra money for social care through council tax, but this simply will not be enough. What makes this even worse is that George Osborne was warned by councils in the North of England that this would not even constitute a sticking plaster over what is needed to adequately fund social care, but he went ahead and did it anyway.

We should of course welcome the fact that even George Osborne, who is out of touch with the needs of ordinary people in areas such as ours, has finally realised just how unpopular his cuts to tax credits were. It was vital that Labour colleagues and I campaigned against the Government and got the victory on this. Lots of constituents contacted me about this, some sharing very personal stories about how much they would suffer if the cuts went ahead, so I am especially pleased that these cuts will not be going ahead yet.

Don’t be fooled however that this indicates any desire from the chancellor to see the error of his ways and scrap his wish to scrap tax credits. As the BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg points out here, these cuts are simply postponed until 2020, which makes it even more necessary that we beat the Tories in five years’ time. The country, and in particular areas such as ours, cannot afford 15 years of Tory rule. I will continue to work hard to fight against the devastating cuts handed down by George Osborne and the Tories, making sure that local people are not left behind by this Government.

My Autumn Statement Reaction

The headline from yesterday’s Autumn Statement, Chairman Mao aside, is George Osborne’s apparent U-turn on cuts to tax credits, but that was just about the only piece of good news...

Network_Rail.pngSir Peter Hendy, the Chairman of Network Rail has issued the report into its future projects.

It is welcome that this report confirms that Transpennine electrification will definitely go ahead, something I have actively campaigned for ever since the scheme was put on pause by the Government earlier this year. This is a victory for local rail users who regularly use Stalybridge station for commuting in and out Manchester. However there is still real disappointment felt by passengers that the original deadline will not be met, which the Government and Network Rail have to take responsibility for.

Lilian Greenwood MP, ‎Labour’s Shadow Transport Secretary, responding to the Hendy Report has said:

“Ministers are cynically trying to hide bad news by publishing this report late on the day of the Comprehensive Spending Review. It’s an insult to taxpayers that incompetent planning has created a £2.5 billion budget black hole that will be funded by £1.8 billion of asset sales, along with £700 million of additional borrowing. Labour and the Transport Select Committee repeatedly warned the Government that its rail electrification programme was in jeopardy, but Ministers refused to address the issue until after the election. We now know that electrification costs have risen by over 70 per cent, and after already announced delays to ‘Northern Powerhouse’ projects of up to four years, other important projects will also be delivered late. Ministers could have got a grip on these issues much earlier, and passengers and taxpayers are paying the price.”

A copy of the Hendy Review can be found here.

Published 26/11/2015

The publication of Network Rail's Hendy Review

Sir Peter Hendy, the Chairman of Network Rail has issued the report into its future projects. It is welcome that this report confirms that Transpennine electrification will definitely go ahead,...

syria-war-flag1.jpgThe despicable attacks in Paris last week were a telling reminder of the threat we face from terrorism, and of the need to take all steps necessary to ensure the safety and security of the United Kingdom. The unprecedented show of solidarity with France across the world is a sign of the resolve and determination that we will need every inch of if we are to prevail against Daesh (ISIS).

Understandably, the prospect of UK military intervention in Syria has again been raised by the Prime Minister. We do not yet know what he will propose and of course I will listen to any case he makes, but to date I have been sceptical of the Government's position. In 2013, MPs were asked to approve airstrikes against the Assad regime and in support of his opponents. The House of Commons refused to do so, on the grounds that the outcome would have been similar to that in Libya – the collapse of the state – but with much more bloodshed and the prospect of Assad’s chemical weapons falling into the hands of the jihadis fighting to depose him.

Now we will be asked to support the use of air power on the opposite side in the Syrian civil war – against Daesh.  This feels like a step in the right direction. However, there is vital question that must be answered: who will supply the credible ground forces without which airstrikes cannot be decisive? Government Ministers frequently state it isn’t logical to refuse to bomb Daesh in Syria when we are bombing them in Iraq, but the answer to this is straightforward: in Iraq we have allies on the ground, in the form of the Iraqi Army and the Kurdish Peshmerga. In Syria no such allies currently exist, unless we are to find common cause with the Assad forces we were seeking to bomb just two years ago, and who have murdered and displaced by far the greatest number of Syrian civilians.

A credible ground force is the only way to drive Daesh from Syria. This will require the agreement of both Russia and the current Syrian Government, and in all likelihood this force will have to remain for several years to stabilise the country. For this reason, and to prevent a further cycle of violence and recrimination against so-called ‘infidel’ occupying forces, I believe this force needs to drawn from regional states.

Such a multi-national force can be assembled – but it will require a coalition with the regional powers who are willing and able to mount the required military effort on the ground. Bombing on its own will not be effective, no matter how appalled we are by the atrocities of our enemies.

If such a strategy to win is presented, it could command my support and my vote. But if not, I would oppose airstrikes on the basis they would not help us defeat Daesh. I therefore await the proposals the Prime Minister has indicated he will bring forward in the next few weeks.   

 

Photo credit: Freedom House (Creative Commons license)

The situation in Syria

The despicable attacks in Paris last week were a telling reminder of the threat we face from terrorism, and of the need to take all steps necessary to ensure the...

Liquid syntax error: Error in tag 'subpage' - No such page slug cookies